This caught my attention. An article in the Vancouver Sun about a week ago, “Research appears to undo what we thought we knew about sex and stuff”. (Actual headline.)
Apparently hetero women just aren’t hard-wired, cerebrally, to be aroused by the sight of naked men, while we all know that the sight of a nekkid lady makes most men’s eyes sproing out on springs and their hearts pound visibly in their chests. Or maybe I’ve just seen to many Merrie Melodies cartoons.
Anyway, Meredith Chivers, a research fellow at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health at the University of Toronto, found that straight women were no more excited by videos of hunky, naked men doing yoga than by the control footage: slow camera pans of snow-capped Himalayan mountains.
But when the same female group viewed naked women exercising, their blood flow increased sharply. And it was monitored well since Chivers had hooked her subjects up to a photoplethysmograph in a place that makes them extremely tolerant, broadminded, easy-going volunteers.
This adds to a growing body of evidence that female sexuality is more multi-dimensional, and a lot more interesting, than men’s.
Women’s apparent gender tolerance presents an unexpected challenge for straight men, who, predictably, are only turned on by women.
The competition for a woman’s love has doubled. It’s one thing to fight an army of male suitors, quite another to stand against all of humanity. What straight men have long considered an erotic fantasy has become a threat to their manhood. Women think other women are hot; men, not so much. It’s tough to be a guy.
Or to put it another way — guys, remember that when you get out of the shower and strut around, to her you’re just a snow-capped Himalaya.